What started this back and forth between McKibben and von Reitz? Mike received an email from John S. who was praising Anna for some newsletter she sent out. Mike replied to John S. with this email, which was apparently forwarded to Anna, who then wrote Michael this email (see attached hyperlink.)
Michael’s email to John S.
“I am having serious issues with some of her recent writings. I have not followed her until recently. She is showing extreme bias that essentially protects the British Empire from culpability. This corporate perspective is a distraction, seems to me. The Queen working under the Pope is not proved in the evidence I have seen. The existence of the Knights of Malta, English Priory, since 1888 proves it to be the other way around. That is a misdirection that no one can do anything about. That is the nature of good propaganda (the problem is so big and confusing as to give one a hopeless, impotent feeling). OK, so you declare yourself a natural person. Then what? This is playing in the demonic lawyer sandbox and gets us nowhere, unless I am missing something. To me, the answer is to bar lawyers from becoming bureaucrats, judges, bankers, or politicians.
She recently disclosed she is a “good” Boston Brahmin. The Brahmins are intimately interlocked with the British Empire aristocracy, and since 1902, their collective founding of the Pilgrims Society and the interlocking of Boston, NY and London banks fueled by the slave and opium trade. The entire foundation of the Brahmins was embroiled in slaves and opium to build Boston. Can good sprout from evil? So the premise that there are “good” Brahmins that operate on the backs and money of endemic evil is dubious, or at least naïve thinking. She is claiming the benefits of that association without owning up to the utter corruptitude of that institution, not to mention its corrosive effects on the American Republic.”
For more info on the Brahmins, see our recent pieces: