Magic does not break the laws of physics; it merely hides them from view. This is the essence of our current election systems. To me, after all of this work, it is apparent that the ‘state’ has assumed the role of the ‘magician’, realizing that ‘illusion’ and ‘fantasy’ are easy to substitute for ‘reality’.
Maybe, each citizen should watch the child’s video of ‘action/reaction’ before they sit in front of the tally machine that counts for them, making the tally ‘hidden and secret’.
Why is there ‘faith’ in the ‘hidden and secret’ and no ‘faith’ in the ‘observable phenomenon’? I think because the citizens have become uneducated to the point where ‘entertainment’ has more value than ‘physical reality’. Think 9/11.
I called the Chairman of the Washington state Democrat Party and asked if he was interested in the ‘Writ’. He immediately began to tell me the ‘process’ for the ‘ballots’, never mentioning the ‘tally’ which is ‘hidden and secret’.
When I pointed this out, he immediately said the machines were ‘tested’.
I asked by ‘whom’.
He said the ‘Federal government’.
I asked if the Feds actually did the work or if it was a 3rd Party vendor expert? He did not know. So the point is made.
No one is actually questioning the magic? Everyone has been focused by the ‘state’ or the ‘magician’ on the ‘ballots’, ‘ballot security’, ‘ballot numbering’, ‘ballot storage’, etc. No one has ‘ever’ asked about the ‘tally’ process. In WaCourts, not appellate documents denote actually questioning the ‘machines’ themselves. Everyone, is merely being entertained.
To learn more about Writs of Mandamus that you can file with your secretary of the state or election officials, see
From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
A Grand Jury had been empaneled.
Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.
Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.
Hmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.
Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?
None other than James Comey.
Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?
Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? Lois Lerner…
Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?
Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?
None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.
Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this timeframe???
Robert Mueller.
What do all four casting characters have in common?
They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.
Let’s fast forward to 2009, shall we?
James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.
Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.
The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hildabeast.
Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to” no other than?
However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Arkansas Bill goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.
Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.
Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?
Yep, Robert Mueller.
He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.
Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland.
No other than, Rod Rosenstein.
Guess what happened to the informant?
The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.
How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?
~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.
Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?
No other than, Lois Lerner.
Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?
Let’s fast forward to 2015.
Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hildabeast ran the State Department on a unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.
He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.
He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.
I will spare you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for the Hildabeast.
Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?
Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer.
No other than James Comey.
Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.
Can you guess what happened next?
In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.
They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.
Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hildabeast from any wrongdoing.
Can you see the pattern?
I could go on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.
FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it.
All the same players.
All compromised and conflicted.
All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.
All connected in one way or another to the Clinton’s.
How many lives have these two destroyed?
It cannot be numbered.
As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.
What are we going to do with these anti-American, globalists in the House of Representatives? They are determined to keep borders open and allow an invasion of America by illegal aliens.
First. Educate yourself by listening to this brief video below.
Second. Read the selection below, submitted by Anonymous Collective, to better understand this anti-American bill.
Third. Look to see if your district representative passed this amendment out of committee. The list is also below.
Fourth. Call or email your representative and give them a royal piece of your mind that you want our border locked-down and that this sneaky attempt to appease globalists has not gone unnoticed by patriots. Kill this amendment now.
The House Appropriations Committee this week approved the Department of Homeland Security funding bill for fiscal year 2019 (starting October 1, 2018), after considering a raft of amendments. This is not necessarily the final product; the bill will likely be amended further if and when considered by the full House of Representatives, and again when the House and Senate confer on reconciling their respective versions of the legislation.
Nevertheless, at this stage the DHS appropriations bill, passed Wednesday on a party-line vote of 29–22, is a snapshot of priorities of this most important committee. And it contains several harmful provisions that would increase illegal immigration and the importation of foreign workers on “temporary” visas — provisions passed with the support of the Republican chairmen of the full committee and its Homeland Security subcommittee.
The following is not necessarily an exhaustive listing of its immigration-related provisions, but it highlights the most important ones.
Funding levels. The provision most remarked on is the $5 billion for “Border Security Assets and Infrastructure,” i.e., construction of an estimated 200 miles of border barriers, without the restrictions that are in the current-year funding bill that prevent use of funds for anything like a wall.
The bill also funds more than 400 additional Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and increases the number of detention beds by more than 3,000 over the current level, to 44,000. That said, the funds approved are very different from what the administration requested. The mostly non-immigration part of ICE, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), is given about 17 percent more funding than the administration requested, while Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), which handles deportations, is given 19 percent less than requested.
Asylum standards. The worst mischief comes in the amendments. Among those added in Wednesday’s markup, perhaps the most damaging is one introduced by Representative David Price (D., N.C.), supported by Representative Kevin Yoder (R., Kan.), chairman of the panel’s Homeland Security subcommittee, and approved by voice vote.
The measure prevents U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) from implementing the attorney general’s ruling regarding eligibility for asylum.
Last month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed the creeping expansion of asylum by formally determining that domestic abuse and gang violence are not grounds for asylum from persecution due to “membership in a particular social group,” as specified in the 1980 Refugee Act. This expansion of the grounds for asylum took place under the prior administration without congressional action and has contributed to the surge of Central American minors and families at the border.
The amendment to the funding bill would have its immediate impact on the first step in the asylum process, called the “credible fear” interview. When an alien at a port of entry or in the custody of the Border Patrol expresses a fear of return to his home country, he is interviewed by a USCIS officer to determine whether the fear is credible and could lead to a successful asylum claim. If the alien’s fear of return is deemed credible, he may then pursue an asylum claim, though many who are released into the U.S. to do so don’t follow through, but simply disappear into the illegal population. Aliens have thus been coached by smugglers to claim asylum as a way of gaining access to the U.S.
The attorney general’s ruling, and the subsequent guidance from USCIS to its officers, has had an immediate effect at the border. For if fear of gangs or of an abusive partner — i.e., private violence rather than state or state-sanctioned violence — is no longer a grounds for asylum, then aliens asserting such fears no longer pass the credible-fear interview and can be turned away or deported immediately.
Were the Price-Yoder amendment to be signed into law, the attorney general’s ruling would remain unchanged, but USCIS officers could not rely on it in making credible-fear determinations.
It’s not clear how that would work as a practical matter, but the clear goal is to ensure that any alien who claims “persecution” on the ineligible grounds would nonetheless be let into the United States.
This would make regaining control of the border difficult, if not impossible — no matter how big the wall might be — because the Obama-era welcome mat for bogus asylum seekers would not only be restored but enshrined in statute, meaning smugglers could rely on it as a means of getting their customers past the Border Patrol and into the interior of the country.
Foreign workers. Two amendments expanding work-visa programs were also passed by the Appropriations Committee. The first determines that H-2A seasonal-farmworker visas no longer have to be seasonal. This was done to satisfy lobbyists for the dairy industry, which works year-round and wants to import cheap foreign labor through this unlimited visa program; it is stymied by the wording of the statute, which limits the visa to work “of a temporary or seasonal nature.”
The appropriations bill does not change the wording of the statute creating the farmworker visa; it merely says that workers will be admitted in FY 2019 under that provision of the law “without regard to whether such labor is, or services are, of a temporary or seasonal nature.” It would result in large, ongoing increases in the number of these “temporary” foreign workers.
The other foreign-worker amendment affects the H-2B visa, which is the non-agricultural equivalent of the H-2A, used mainly by landscapers and hotels and restaurants. The amendment was just the latest round in lobbyists’ relentless backroom push to exempt from the visa’s numerical cap all those workers who came in prior years (in this case, in the prior two years). This was accomplished in the previous two budgets via a gutless gimmick — the DHS secretary would be authorized (wink, wink) to exempt returning workers from the cap if it seemed necessary. That way, congressmen wouldn’t have their fingerprints on the increase. At least this time they chose not to hide behind the gimmick.
Country caps. Another amendment also benefits those on “temporary” visas, though it doesn’t increase overall numbers. This measure (which has been floating around for years and was reintroduced in this Congress as H.R. 392) would eliminate the per-country cap for employment-based visas and increase it for family-based visas. H-1B and L visas are ostensibly temporary, but are widely used as stepping-stones to permanent immigration.
The per-country caps were enacted decades ago as a kind of circuit breaker, to prevent a handful of countries from monopolizing the immigration flow. Their effect today is to lengthen the wait for certain immigrants from India, China, the Philippines, and Mexico, compared with similarly situated immigrants from countries that account for less of the immigration flow. The caps result in a more diverse immigration flow.
The lobbying juice behind this change is Big Tech and the Indian “temporary” workers it has imported on H-1B and L visas. These are also ostensibly temporary visas but are widely used as stepping-stones to permanent immigration. But so many of them are given out that the workers endure extended periods of de facto indentured servitude waiting for their numbers to come up.
Eliminating the cap would speed up the issuance of their green cards, making the H-1B that much more attractive to potential low-paid tech workers and that much more useful for employers looking to replace their American workforce with foreigners. The flip side is that people from other countries, generally more highly skilled than the H-1Bs, would be crowded out as virtually all employment-based green cards went to Indians.
There’s more! Not to drag this out, but there are more bad amendments that the GOP appropriators tacked on. Representative Yoder himself co-sponsored a provision prohibiting the separation of children from parents unless “the parent has a criminal history, a communicable, disease, or is determined to be unfit or a danger to the child.” This is a formal, statutory exemption from prosecution for illegal entry for all adults who bring children with them — and will thus result in even more border-jumpers’ bringing (or renting) children.
A seemingly pointless amendment prohibits the deportation of anyone in the lawless Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. It’s pointless because DACA, by definition, prevents your deportation, and the only DACA beneficiaries who get deported are those who forfeit their status because of crimes. Since the amendment can have no actual result, the real point seems to be to codify Obama’s illegal DACA power grab by getting Congress to acknowledge it and incorporate it into law.
And needless to say, the Republican-run Appropriations Committee did nothing to defund sanctuary cities.
It’s not clear to me why Representative Yoder, as Homeland Security subcommittee chairman, orchestrated this fiasco. He actually has a respectable career immigration grade from Numbers USA of B+; not as good as Ted Cruz’s A+ but better than John Cornyn’s C+. And, for including wall funding, Yoder was effusively endorsed by President Trump and rewarded with a ride on Air Force One — and the next day he sabotaged the president’s immigration agenda.
Hill staff assured me that the most egregious items won’t make it to the floor or will be killed in conference (if the bill even gets that far). But why take the chance? Will the Democratic appropriators stock their bills with Republican priorities if they take over next year?
Here are the anti-American representatives that support the illegal invasion of America.
These representatives cast their votes for globalists, not AMERICANS.
Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, New Jersey, Chairman
Harold Rogers, Kentucky
Robert B. Aderholt, Alabama
Kay Granger, Texas
Michael K. Simpson, Idaho
John Abney Culberson, Texas
Ken Calvert, California
Tom Cole, Oklahoma
Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
Tom Graves, Georgia
Kevin Yoder, Kansas
Steve Womack, Arkansas
Jeff Fortenberry, Nebraska
Thomas J. Rooney, Florida
Charles J. Fleischmann, Tennessee
Jaime Herrera Beutler, Washington
David P. Joyce, Ohio
David G. Valadao, California
Andy Harris, MD, Maryland
Martha Roby, Alabama
Mark E. Amodei, Nevada
Chris Stewart, Utah
David Young, Iowa
Evan H. Jenkins, West Virginia
Steven Palazzo, Mississippi
Dan Newhouse, Washington
John R. Moolenaar, Michigan
Scott Taylor, Virginia
John Rutherford, Florida
Just because this horrendous bill left Yoder’s committee, doesn’t mean that it is law yet. Call your representative and tell them how you feel about this attempt to keep our borders open and citizens at risk of alien invasion and crime.
Below is an email conversation a few of our team members had about best questions to ask state election officials regarding election integrity. You will find seven great questions (below) that you can ask in a letter, a FOIA request, or schedule a face-to-face meeting with officials.
After you watch the short video below, we hope you are willing to help citizens around the country to become more involved in election and voting transparency.
These are questions that our researchers asked the state of Washington. You could ask your state the same questions.
I have not received satisfactory or conclusive evidence that bipartisan chain of custody is possible using the Smartmatic election machines or electronic devices of any kind in WA state’s voting process. It is the ‘people’s’ responsibility to ensure unbroken bipartisan chain of custody, and each ‘voting citizen’ has the right under the Federal and the WA state constitution to know that this is true.
We are not stating that there is ‘voter fraud’, we are asking simply for proof that bipartisan chain of custody is in reality–not broken beyond a ‘shadow of doubt’.
Any action taken, whereby the ‘tally’ or ‘counts’ of any voting procedure are ‘hidden’ from observation, which is ‘impossible’ when it is performed and transmitted by ‘electrons’ in a ‘digital form’ fails the test of ‘unbroken bipartisan chain of custody observation as empirical evidence’.
At no time, can bipartisan chain of custody be subject to ‘FAITH’ , ‘law’, ‘vendor certification’, testing’ or any process’ that is ‘hidden from empirical observation’…when this is the basis for ‘certification’, it by logic, and physical law fails the test.
The will of the people cannot be subject ‘FAITH’ from government, the tally count must be ‘totally observable’ at all times, without failure.
Electronic devices depend upon ‘failure modes’ or ‘statistical outcomes’ that depend upon ‘software programs’, ’embedded circuitry’, and ‘clean sine wave electricity’, which are ‘hidden from observation, and thus fail the test by default of logic of ‘unbroken bipartisan chain of custody’.
Thus, the WA state election process fails by default to pass the test for certification. It is open to ‘man in the middle attacks’, and corruption. As such, the ‘will of the people’ can be circumvented by sophistication, technology, and conspiracy through electronic means. This is the underlying logic of my FOIA requests.
FOIA request questions:
1. specifically name the 3rd party tester (and the actually testers themselves) and how that company and those people are certified by a bipartisan chain of custody committee in WA?
2. When the memory stick is delivered to the county auditor by the vendor what ‘proof exists’, other than a ‘certification piece of paper’ that the ‘correct’ part number has been delivered?
3. Is the ‘memory stick, on which the tally at each county is entered and sent to the state, tested against an encrypted part number sent to the STATE and the AUDITOR by another communication channel such as certified mail to ensure that the proper ‘memory stick’ has been delivered to the auditor by comparison(a phone call recorded)?
4. What programs exist on the memory stick?
5. What circuits exist on the memory stick, and what circuits are ‘blue printed’ as the baseline as the ‘official circuits’, and how is this tested and reported as ‘clean’?
6. Are the ‘memory sticks’ impounded after the election, and are they available for inspection after the election and for how long, or is the evidence ‘erased’?
7. Is there a ‘micro-voltage’ activation ‘count’ embedded in the memory stick’s program, so that when it is received at the county auditor’s site, when ‘plugged in’ the count is visible to attest that it has not been reprogrammed during ‘transport’, by a ‘man in the middle’? (this would make the whole voting procedure a magic act as it exists)
8. Is each county auditor required to create a ‘bipartisan human hand tally’ as well as a PCOS/Smartmatic machine tally to audit each ‘tally count’ against each other, while preserving both tally counts as unbroken bipartisan chain of custody tallies?
Please provide the public records for these questions as a continuance of the original FOIA request as noted by your statement prior to closure. Thank you
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
These were the answers we received. The answer is highlighted inred. The note marked Note:## in blue is a side note from us.
First, thank you for reaching out to our office with you questions. I just want to make it clear that not Smartmatic voting system or equipment is not in use or certified for use in the State of Washington.
specifically name the 3rd party tester (and the actually testers themselves) and how that company and those people are certified by a bipartisan chain of custody committee in WA?
a. Independent testing authorities (or commonly known as Voting System Testing Laboratories (VSTL)) are designated by the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
Note:## As stated, FAITH does not translate into ‘bipartisan chain of custody’. There is a total ‘cognitive dissonance’ working in the state’s collective mind; such that they refuse to answer this question with each round.
When the memory stick is delivered to the county auditor by the vendor what ‘proof exists’, other than a ‘certification piece of paper’ that the ‘correct’ part number has been delivered?
a. County Auditors are required to do acceptance testing of their voting system prior to use as well as Logic and Accuracy Testing of the voting system prior to each election to ensure that the voting system, including hardware and software, is the certified voting system. Each voting system can produce a hash value that would correspond to the hash value provided by the Voting System Testing Laboratory. This hash value would show that the software in use has not been changed. (WAC 434-335-240 & RCW 29A.12.130). Logic and Accuracy tests are open to the public and election observers.
3. Is the ‘memory stick, on which the tally at each county is entered and sent to the state, tested against an encrypted part number sent to the STATE and the AUDITOR by another communication channel such as certified mail to ensure that the proper ‘memory stick’ has been delivered to the auditor by comparison(a phone call recorded)?
a. If the ‘memory stick’ is part of the voting system, then yes that can be done. However, not all voting systems have ‘memory sticks’ as part of the voting system. Each County Auditor can choose the method they’d like to transfer election results from the tabulation system. For example, some counties use one-write media like CDs or DVDs and some use election specific USB drives that are formatted prior to use. In either case, they are secured before and after the election.
4. What programs exist on the memory stick?
a. None. They are only used to transfer files in some counties depending on the voting system and procedures in place for that county.
5. What circuits exist on the memory stick, and what circuits are ‘blue printed’ as the baseline as the ‘official circuits’, and how is this tested and reported as ‘clean’?
Note:## The county auditor lied to me. She specifically stated that the ‘state’ sends the memory stick and it is not up to them to choose the media on which they transfer information to the state!
a. This would be county specific based on the ‘memory sticks’ in use for the voting system and procedures in place for that county.
6. Are the ‘memory sticks’ impounded after the election, and are they available for inspection after the election and for how long, or is the evidence ‘erased’?
a. This is county specific depending on the voting system and procedures in place for that county because not all counties use the same voting system and not all use ‘memory sticks’. All documents related to the election have a retention and must be retained for their entire retention period. (https://www.sos.wa.gov/_assets/archives/county-auditor-rrs-ver-5.0.pdf)
7. Is there a ‘micro-voltage’ activation ‘count’ embedded in the memory stick’s program, so that when it is received at the county auditor’s site, when ‘plugged in’ the count is visible to attest that it has not been reprogrammed during ‘transport’, by a ‘man in the middle’? (This would make the whole voting procedure a magic act as it exists.)
a. Election Results are verified using a paper copy of the results. When results are transported from the tabulation equipment to be uploaded to the state, a paper copy of the results is used to verify the results are appearing accurately. Additionally, that same paper copy is provided to the state to ensure that after the results were uploaded they match the physical copy of the results. There are several methods and opportunities, as stated in our previous response, for auditing during the election canvassing to ensure the tabulation equipment is accurate.
NOTE##: Here is the problem: the count is still hidden. It does not matter how many tests are run prior to the ballots being entered, if the media is not ‘tested’. Also, if the media is sent by any method other than a bipartisan group of humans, bipartisan chain of custody is lost. There is no mention of a standard method. I guess each Auditor can choose!!!
8. Is each county auditor required to create a ‘bipartisan human hand tally’ as well as a PCOS/Smartmatic machine tally to audit each ‘tally count’ against each other, while preserving both tally counts as unbroken bipartisan chain of custody tallies?
a. Smartmatic voting systems are not certified or used in the State of Washington.
NOTE##: He didn’t answer the question. He simply stated that Smartmatic is not used. However, another machine is used, but they do not volunteer that information.
Four questions we asked from Washington State Records/Public Disclosure Officer as a FOIA request and her answers back to us.
Below is information provided by Washington State Elections Division.
How do you ensure bi-partisan ‘chain of custody’ on any electronic device that sits between the voter and the ‘county/city/special district’ for local elections, and the ‘state’ for state elections, and the ‘federal election’ for federal positions?
To answer your question, I’m interpreting “electronic device” as an in-person ballot marking system that retains an electronic voting record of each vote cast, direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine, and the county’s voting system that tabulates returned ballots.
Before any voting system can be used in the State of Washington it first must be tested and certified by an independent testing authority designated by the United States election assistance commission as well as inspected and tested by the Secretary of State’s Office (RCW 29A.12.080). During the Secretary of State’s inspection of the voting system we ensure it meets our requirements for all voting systems (WAC 434-335-040) which include “Secures to the voter secrecy in the act of voting” and “Be capable of being secured with lock and seal when not in use”.
The Secretary of State’s Office requires the use of secure storage which must employ the use of numbered seals and logs, or other security measures which will detect any inappropriate or unauthorized access to the secured ballot materials and must be accompanied by at least two county auditor staff at all times. (WAC 434-261-045, WAC 434-250-110 & RCW 29A.40.110). The seal logs or other measures used by every county document the chain of custody for who accessed the secured ballots which includes electronic voting devices that retain electronic voting records. However, part of our state certification requirements of any voting system is that the voting device must produce a voter verifiable paper ballot.
Additionally, observers may be present during the processing of ballots because the entire process is open to the public.
How do you ensure that the ‘electronic devices’ are monitored by ‘bipartisan’ citizens, trained to monitor the ballot tally totals?
Prior to each election, the County Auditor must request observers be appointed by the major political parties to be present during the processing of ballots. Campaigns or organizations may also be requested to appoint observers. The County Auditor can train observers with respect to ballot processing procedures and the vote tallying system (RCW 29A.40.100 & WAC 434-261-020)
do you ensure the bipartisan election monitors/judges can affirmatively verify that each vote is entered, reported, and tallied without intervention by unseen software modules whose operations do not appear to be empirically observable?
Prior to certification of the election the County Auditor must audit of results of votes cast on any direct recording electronic voting devices used in the county, if applicable, a random check of the ballot counting equipment, and an audit of duplicated ballots.
In 2019, Risk Limiting Audits will become an option for counties to use to audit their voting equipment. Rules for conducting a Risk Limiting Audit will be in place no later than January 1, 2019. Risk Limiting Audits provide statistical evidence and confidence that the count was accurate while keeping the resources needed by the county to as little as possible.
I request the ‘public records’ that prove the above questions regarding the usage of all ‘electronic devices’ used in the voting process…all stages where ‘datum’ is processing in any manner by non-humans, as part of the voting procedure that results in a ‘summation’, ‘addition’, ‘subtraction’, ‘tally’, ‘vote count’ as an ‘official’ record of the voting process.
If you’re interested in the chain of custody logs, observer procedures, audit procedures, or specific documents about the use of the voting system you’d need to request those documents from the County Auditor because the Secretary of State’s Office does not process any ballots, conduct tabulation, or operate a voting system.
Notes from our research team as we were analyzing these comments from Washington State officials in the above correspondences:
This only assumes that the hash value created didn’t change. That doesn’t address the integrity of the underlying software program. If the embedded backdoor program is burned on the firmware, hardware or operating system, then this hash value is not useful. This does not address the problems of lack of VISUAL verification.
These procedures do not address bipartisan chain of custody. They force the chain of custody to accept all this integrity testing in faith.
In fact, this process forces the election judges to LIE when they certify the vote (since they CANNOT know if the underlying software is counting properly). It forces them to break the law.
Ban all electronic voting machines NOW. When you have listened to Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben explain how electronic voting machines steal your votes and give them to globalist candidates, continue your election education by reading the articles under the audio.
Manafort recently faced some indictments that John Podesta and the Podesta Group (separately) should have faced for doing exactly the same thing, only worse. Cheryl Mills is no different. They get away with this because they are intelligence community assets.
The State Department did not disclose that Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills had a special arrangement in 2009 that allowed her to hold outside positions with the William J. Clinton Foundation, New York University, and an Abu Dhabi-funded group.
The agency came under scrutiny in 2013, after it was reported that Clinton’s close aide Huma Abedin had been granted “special government employee” status under Clinton, which allowed her to work as a part-time consultant for the State Department while also taking private clients that had financial ties to the former First Family.
J&T Packing seemingly has a board of directors very similar to the Clinton Foundation. Whatever questions exist about this entity, the truth is this cast of characters leads to a great deal of other leads that span across the globe with businesses, NGO’s, and seemingly clandestine operations.
As a result of this, many people became aware of the Black Ivy Group and began to ask about some curious emails. You may have seen this snippet, before:
In 2010, Cheryl Mill’s planted “Building Haiti’s Economy One Mango At A Time”. Mills forwards the story to HRC. HRC asks “who does he work for” (meaning the writer Jean-Louis Warnholz) and Mills responds “he works for us now”.
Jean-Louis emails Cheryl “Random Good News”…. “Cheryl Because it’s that kind of day and that kind of week:
1) Sae-A shipped the first 65,000 shirts ‘Made in Haiti’ that should hit Walmart stores soon. They now employ a 1,000 workers, many trained by a USG-financed training center.
2) *Only two mango trees had to be uprooted at the Caracol Park. Trees under threat are now being transplanted to the Caracol Ekam housing. *”
(It may be just a coincidence that 65,000 is also the amount of money spent on “pizza and hot dogs” at a now infamous White House party.)
December 21, 2012. HRC emails Cheryl Mills and asks “How is Seven doing? Any photos?”.
Jean-Louis Warnholz and Cheryl Mills both now work at The Black Ivy Group.
Many have posited that mango trees are women who are kept specifically to produce children for child trafficking.
But, as you can see, all the players are already there. George Soros’ ex-employee now works for “us” meaning the Clinton Foundation through the Black Ivy proxy.
/u/bonniedundee put some of these pieces together over a year ago…
Clarification: Hillary didn’t receive a box of mangoes, but she was apprised of the establishment of a mango distribution pipeline from Pakistan to the U.S. Could this be a cover for transporting child merchandise through a USAID/Pakistan program? FBI anon told us to look for connections to USAID because children were transported in USAID shipping containers.
Why was Hillary so interested in mangos (misspelled) from Pakistan? Why do they talk about “partners in crime”? Could “mango” be code for child merchandise?
Mills is the daughter of a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army and grew up on Army posts all over the world, including Belgium, West Germany, and the U.S.
Mills founded BlackIvy Group and is CEO of BlackIvy group, a company which builds and grows enterprises in Africa.[6][33] Her close professional relationship with Sae-A chairman Woong-ki Kim led them to join hands with Costa Rican president Luis Guillermo Solís cutting the ribbon at the new Sae-A factory in Costa Rica.
The managing partner at Hogan Lovells’ Hamburg, Germany, office has stepped down after he was accused of teaming up with an energy supplier client’s human resources director to spy on a former employee who had filed a labor lawsuit against the company, the firm confirmed Thursday.
Cheryl Mills did live in West Germany, coincidentally.
City law firm Hogan Lovells accused of ‘whitewash’ investigation into South African government corruption
City law firm Hogan Lovells has been drawn into the growing corruption scandal in South Africa amid allegations it produced a “whitewash” report into claims of money laundering at a government agency.
Her former employer does seem to have all the elements of being an intelligence community asset, as well. Hogan Lovells deserves its own post, but you can see a clear pattern of covering for corruption across the world.
I thank him dearly for continuing to fight and expose these shenanigans of legal charlatans such as Hogan Lovells. They have aided and abetted this crooked Moyane and Makwakwa to continue in their service to the corrupt President of South Africa and his cronnies the Guptas and robbing the taxpayers of South Africa
Cheryl Mills has no problem ignoring court orders to produce evidence. It is clear where she learned this from.
Hogan Lovells has even inserted a plant into Trump’s legal team.
Ty Cobb, a longtime Hogan Lovells partner based in Washington, D.C., has joined President Donald Trump’s legal team as special counsel. His last day at Hogan Lovells will be July 30, the firm’s chairman said in an all-firm email sent Friday afternoon.
Of course, he intentionally created some news stories by talking about “Russiagate” out loud at a restaurant in front of reporters.
Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills has brazenly threatened to violate a court order and delete State Department emails. What role would she play in a Hillary Clinton administration? Investigation obstructor in chief?
Mills, Clinton and Clinton aide Huma Abedin were ordered on July 31 by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan to produce “all responsive information that was or is in their possession as a result of their employment at the State Department.”
Clinton has since told Sullivan that she has turned over all work-related emails from her private account, and Abedin’s lawyer has told the media that “we have been working expeditiously to gather the remaining materials in Ms. Abedin’s possession that are responsive or potentially responsive.”
Mills’ response to the judge? Drop dead. Well, not her exact words, but the essence of what her lawyers are saying. In a letter dated Aug. 6, the attorneys said that “following our production on Aug. 10, 2015, we have instructed (Mills) to delete any and all electronic copies (of potential federal records) in her possession.”
This is an email chain between Mae Podesta (John’s daughter, I think) and Cheryl Mills about her possibly working with Mills’ company, BlackIvy Group (http://blackivygroup.com/markets-2/).
There is mention of a pipeline in the email and the BlackIvy website and the “Our Markets” page (http://blackivygroup.com/markets-2/) mentions their anchor countries:
BlackIvy’s anchor countries, Ghana and Tanzania, enjoy:
central locations—serving as natural gateways to their regions
political stability with leadership committed to private investment
abundant natural resources
competitive and growing labor pools, with young populations
favorable tax and trade incentives with regional and international markets, including the European Union and United States
projected average annual growth of 5.9% and 6.9%, respectively between 2016 and 2020
“BlackIvy has a culture, a company and a team that is built for environments that are challenging to navigate, yet ripe with opportunity.”
Under her name she actually touts her experience at the SD!: “She supervised priority policy areas, including the Obama Administration’s $3.5 billion global hunger and food security initiative spanning 19 countries, 12 in Africa, and diplomacy and development efforts in Haiti.”
All I have to say is poor Africa, if Cheryl Mills has you in her sights…!
The Registered Agent on file for this company is Cheryl D. Mills and is located at 1361 Locust Road, N.W.,, Washington, District Of Columbia 20012. The company’s principal address is 1361 Locust Road, N.W.,, Washington, District Of Columbia 20012.
The company has 1 principal on record. The principal is Cheryl D. Mills from Washington District Of Columbia.
Black Ivy came under fire for proposing for a 23 cent minimum wage in Ghana, despite all the founders and CEOs calling for a 15 dollar minimum wage in the U.S.
Nowadays, Mills and her new company, “BlackIvy Group, LLC,” are pitching the textile industry to business in Ghana by promising a lower minimum wage than competing countries, according to The Daily Caller, who obtained a PowerPoint presentation by Mills’ group.
23 cents per hour amounts to “slave labor” and “slave wages” to many critics and is 1.5 percent of the value of Democrats’ (and Clinton’s) “living wage” of $15 per hour.
Cheryl Mills is founder and Chief Executive Officer of the BlackIvy Group. Prior to BlackIvy, Ms. Mills served as Chief of Staff to Secretary Hillary Clinton and Counselor to the U.S. Department of State, where she managed foreign policy and operational priorities of the $55 billion agency that employs more than 20,000 officials across 180 countries. She supervised priority policy areas, including the Obama Administration’s $3.5 billion global hunger and food security initiative spanning 19 countries, 12 in Africa, and diplomacy and development efforts in Haiti.
Jean-Louis Warnholz is Founding Principal and Managing Director of the BlackIvy Group. Prior to joining BlackIvy, Jean-Louis Warnholz was a Senior Advisor in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s office, focusing on public-private partnerships in emerging markets. Mr. Warnholz brings a track record of identifying emerging economic opportunities in frontier regions and executing ground-breaking ventures to capture these opportunities. He co-founded fastafrica Ltd. and worked in senior advisory positions for governments (UK, US), multilateral institutions (World Bank, UN) and private entities (Soros Economic Development Fund, S&P). Mr. Warnholz executed projects in complex settings from Kosovo to Haiti to Mongolia to Ghana. In Haiti, he coordinated major investments in new factories, housing, power, port and airport infrastructure in the country’s poorest region.
Anthony Welters is currently Executive Chairman of the BlackIvy Group, LLC. He is recently retired as Senior Adviser to the Office of the CEO of UnitedHealth Group, which serves more than 100 million people worldwide through its health and well-being companies. During his tenure at UnitedHealth Group, Mr. Welters also served as Executive Vice President and a Member of the Office of the CEO of UnitedHealth Group and led UHG’s Public and Senior Markets Group. Mr. Welters joined UHG upon its acquisition of AmeriChoice, a health care company he founded in 1989.
Welters was appointed executive vice-president of UnitedHealth Group in December 2006 and served as president of the Public and Senior Markets Group from September 2007 to December 2010. In 2011 Welters joined the office of UnitedHealth Group’s CEO. He gained notice when QSSI was granted a contract to implement HealthCare. gov and then was purchased by UnitedHealth Group subsidiary, Optum.
Anthony and Beatrice Welters bundled donations totaling between $200,000 and $500,000 for Obama’s campaign during the 2008 election cycle, according to campaign finance data compiled by Center for Responsive Politics. President Obama appointed Beatrice Welters as U.S. ambassador to Trinidad and Tobago. (18) Anthony Welters is currently executive chairman for Black Ivy Group, LLC, started by Cheryl Mills, a consulting firm focused on sub-Saharan Africa.
Welters founded AmeriChoice Corporation in 1989 and served as president and CEO; it was acquired by UnitedHealth Group in 2002. He serves as chairman of the board of New York University Law and Morehouse School of Medicine. He is the recipient of the prestigious Horatio Alger Award. He serves on multiple boards, including Bard, West Pharmaceutical Services, and Carlyle, and has received numerous awards for philanthropic endeavors.
“Sea-A Trading secured millions of dollars in incentives to make its Haiti investment more attractive,” writes NYT. Sea-A Trading’s chairman Woong-ki Kim became a Clinton Foundation donor after his firm secured the lucrative contract in Haiti. Adding to the intrigue, when Mills left the state department, she started a company called BlackIvy Group—for which Kim is a financial backer. NYT describes the relationship this way: “The partnership with Mr. Kim sheds light on the business activities of Ms. Mills—a longtime Clinton loyalist who is likely to play a significant role in any future Clinton White House—as well as the interlocking public and private relationships that have long characterized the Clintons’ inner circle.”
Top Clinton State Department aide Cheryl Mills is the founder and CEO of BlackIvy Group, a small and mysterious energy investment firm headquartered inside a Microsoft building in the Washington D.C. suburb of Chevy Chase, Maryland. Jean-Louis Warnholz became the founding principal and managing director of BlackIvy Group in 2013 after three years as a senior adviser to Clinton at the State Department. He previously worked for progressive billionaire George Soros’s Soros Economic Development Fund.
“BlackIvy is developing a privately-financed dry port that will be located 56 km outside of the Port of Dar es Salaam, and will use shuttle trains to take transit and upcountry cargo to and from the Port,” BlackIvy spokeswoman Erin Pelton confirmed to Breitbart News.
“BlackIvy is focused on in-land logistics, not operating seaports,” Pelton added, denying that BlackIvy is running into opposition from the Tanzania Ports Authority.
So how did BlackIvy, a brand new firm with no discernible track record of building ports, manage to become an overnight player in the East African energy market?
It turns out Clinton’s former aides had some help from a company called Symbion Power, which was created to profit off rebuilding efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan after the U.S. invasions. Symbion Power happens to be a very good friend of Hillary Clinton’s.
Hillary Clinton visited Tanzania in June 2011. Where did she go to speak? The Symbion Power Plant in Dar Es Salaam, where she spoke in front of Symbion and General Electric (GE) logos. Soon after the speech, Clinton intervened in a business deal between Symbion and GE to help Symbion’s interests in Tanzania.
The correspondence released early this morning, Wilson (the diplomat who challenged the Bush administration’s weapons of mass destruction theory before his wife, Valerie Plame, was outed as a spy) asked the secretary of state in December 2009 about a USAID-funded electrification project in Afghanistan on behalf of Symbion Power, a company he has represented. The existing contractors “should just get out and let companies like Symbion, who have a proven track record get in there and roll up our sleeves,” Wilson wrote.
Clinton forwarded Wilson’s note and a memo from the company’s CEO, Paul Hinks, to her aides Jack Lew (then an under secretary), Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills. “Please check out what Joe is saying here,” she said. “He is now working for a company that has a good track record building in Iraq and wants to do so in Afghanistan. Let me know. Thx.”
Black Ivy/Warnholz builds a dry port in Tanzania Coast region to ease congestions on the roads and at Dar es Salaam harbour, Kibaha District
PLANS are underway to build a dry port in Coast region to ease congestions on the roads and at Dar es Salaam harbour, Kibaha District Administrative Secretary (DAS), Mr Jusseim Mwakipesile has revealed.
Mr Mwakipesile said in his office that already the Managing Director of Black IVY Group which is based in Washington, USA, Mr Jean -Louis Warnholz and his assistants, had talks with the regional authorities which was chaired by the Coast Regional Commissioner, Ms Mwantumu Mahiza earlier this week.
She supervised priority policy areas, including the Obama Administration’s $3.5 billion global hunger and food security initiative spanning 19 countries, 12 in Africa, and diplomacy and development efforts in Haiti. In Haiti, Ms. Mills led the implementation of an $800M public-private partnership in northern Haiti, resulting in the development of one of the largest industrial parks in the Caribbean.
Ms. Mills came to New York to join Oxygen Media, a cable and internet start-up, where she served as Senior Vice President for Corporate Policy and Public Programming.
In conclusion, it is clear that the Black Ivy Group, LLC has employed people who are clearly working in tandem, simultaneously, with the Soros machine and the Clinton machine. They are slavers. They are money launderers. They are interferers of news and creators of propaganda. They are traitors and criminals of the highest order and they should all be put in jail.
At the very least, they do not deserve votes. They do not deserve to be in office and you should not give any political support to these people or any of their friends.
You should also commit to engaging on social media so that people know enough to also stop giving them support. That is all.
Good luck.
This business was created 3,518 days ago in the SOS Office and the registered agent is Tiffany J. Mays that does business at 415 Main Street Little Rock, Ar 72201.
Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben describe the underbelly of the U. S. judicial system and connect the dots between it and corruption that is directly connected with the Queen of England and her Privy Council.
Jean-Louis Warnholz and Cheryl Mills both now work at The Black Ivy Group.
Mills, Clinton and Clinton aide Huma Abedin were ordered on July 31 by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan to produce “all responsive information that was or is in their possession as a result of their employment at the State Department.”
