We posted this video and asked AIMCats from the UK to explain what we are seeing in this video – propaganda, truth, a mix? Our colleagues keep us in the truth lane:

Ben wrote:

Here’s what I’ve got so far:

In 2024, a huge number of Brits signed a petition to hold a general election. Starmer’s response was to point out that Labour has a mandate but also isn’t very popular, so he wasn’t surprised (contradictory? yes), so he’s not going to hold a general election early. (Evidently the next one is scheduled for 2029.) A new petition was started sometime mid this year, urging parliament to hold a vote of no confidence. It very quickly reached the 100k signatures necessary to legally obligate parliament to give it consideration. By three weeks ago, it had eclipsed that number with 900k signatures total, and supposedly that was sill accelerating at the time.

Starmer is still responding with statements like, “That’s not how this works” and is claiming that the 2024 election gave Labour a mandate, despite the fact that it is incredibly unpopular. August popularity polls put Starmer at a measly 24%, but he’s still polling a bit better than Farage (of Reform).

I’m not seeing reports confirming much beyond that. The most recent protests in the UK that I can find any mention of are those surrounding Trump’s visit, which had much lower than expected turnout.

All of this said, even if the video contains some exaggerated or untrue statements, I’ve had conversations in YouTube comments recently with a few Brits. Starmer is widely hated. The reason Labour managed to get into power is because Brits have a unique way of responding to political disappointment: They vote for a party they hate even more than the one currently in power. The Tories failed to keep their promises, so knowing full well that Labour would be far worse, Brits went to the polls and put a Labour government into power. (This is stuff I already knew. The YouTube comment stuff follows.) Now Brits are lamenting what was fundamentally their choice.

It’s hard to create new political parties in the UK, because political parties are government organizations. This means that they are heavily regulated, and creating a new one requires formal registration. (In the U.S., political parties are mostly independent from government, though some states cross the line by forcing political parties to allow people who aren’t members to vote in their primary elections. The only registration needed is generally to put candidates on the ballot, and many states don’t even require that, allowing candidates to be added through public petitions.)

Anyhow, I suspect some of the stuff in the video is made up, but the general feeling isn’t far off. I don’t know about the economic stuff, but it wouldn’t surprise me. I suspect a few businesses are leaving the UK, and the video is blowing it out of proportion. I can’t find any evidence of significant protests outside of Buckingham Palace. Again, I wouldn’t be surprised if there were a few protestors there, but calling it “a protest” is probably not entirely honest.

All of that said, Europe is in trouble. Politically, they’ve let the EU massively overreach its purpose. (The EU originated as a trade union, and since the mid 2010s, it has been trying to govern how national governments in Europe operate. This is part of what sparked Brexit.) Few, if any, European countries have significant militaries, because they are terrified that they will become the next “Nazi Germany”, which has made them very susceptible to conquest. I’m sure you are aware of the immigration problems nearly every European country is having, and most of them won’t close their borders, despite the vast majority of their people wanting them to.

None of their governments represent the people the way they are supposed to. The particular version of the Parliamentary system most European countries used is designed to make it easy for established parties and governments to stay in power and very hard for grassroots efforts to create new parties to succeed. This is part of why Brits voted Labour rather than creating a party that actually cares about the will of the people. One of those things is that a sitting government is never required to hold general elections, unless parliament (or the monarch, in countries that have one) demands one. The result is growing political unrest in most of Europe. Politicians in power have been barely avoiding revolution in many countries, by buying the people off with small things.

In the UK, one of those things is the ID cards Labour is supposedly using to fight illegal immigration, but from what I’ve read, it doesn’t sound like the government is actually enforcing them. It seems they issued the cards purely to calm the people down, with little or no intent to actually make good on the associated promises. Ironically, a lot of countries in Europe that are struggling financially have taken massive loans from German banks. In the late 2010s, Greece was on the verge of default on some of these loans. They aren’t the only country that owes Germany huge amounts of debt though. This isn’t a great situation, because it puts Germany in a place where it’s only recourse for repayment could end up being military conquest. Germany’s government is also having stability issues, and a few years ago, it started engaging in the same kind of oppression of political opponents that the Nazi government did. The government doing this claims it is trying to prevent Nazism from regaining power, but the reality is that the current government is way closer to Nazi behaviors and activities than the alternatives it is oppressing. (The current government may be less bad than Merkel’s government, but I haven’t heard that they’ve made any significant changes. Just last year, Germany’s conservative party was still holding meetings outside of Germany, out of fear of government intervention in meetings within the country.)

That’s as much as I am currently aware of. Some of the video’s claims may not be accurate (though it’s only 2 days old, and it’s possible that the U.S. (or British…) media is censoring some of the information), but the reality may be worse than the video claims. At least protests help people feel heard, even if they aren’t actually. If people aren’t protesting when things are bad, that suggests that pressure is building much more rapidly. We may be seeing revolutions in Europe within the next few years, and if a major country has a revolution, that might embolden the people in other countries in Europe, triggering off waves of additional revolutions.

Anyhow, I hope this helps. This is correct to the best of my knowledge, but it’s entirely possible I’ve missed something or have been prevented from finding things due to censorship by various governments.

Ben

Michael T. sent us this review:

OK that YT video, like most things is a mix of stories that are truth but blurred and mixed over each other.

So last week Digital ID was floated and with in days the petition on Parliaments website flew past 1+ million.

Below are a few links, the Government / Monarchy are in serious trouble because of a court case.

(for general geography Runcorn & Helsby is near Liverpool).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Runcorn_and_Helsby_by-election

The Labour candidate won the seat in the July 2024 election, but due to the candidate punching a member of the public he stood down causing a new election held in MAY 2025

GRAHAM MOORE from the ENGLISH CONSTITUTION PARTY, stood in that election, which reform went on to win by 6 votes, over turning a 10,000+ majority.

Graham challenged the election in the High Court and then won (There were 2 USA officials at the Court case as Observers, so both governments are aware of the stakes) The main hearing due to take place on the 3-5 November.

The other parties have appealed (which was given in a record time) and that appeal will be held in 2 weeks time.

So if the appeal is kicked out then the first game begins in November.

If the Appeal is granted and the November trial does not go ahead that is not the end of it, as Royal Mail did interfere in an election and are subject to a separate case, which the Judges agreed.

Two people from Royal mail have been suspended/sacked, this is real, this is a Constitutional Issue and a Government Issue.

See video clips below Graham has released what his closing argument is for the appeal (last clip)

THE ROYAL MAIL KNOWINGLY INTERFERED WITH AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN at Runcorn & Helsby – 6 mins

How they are destroying your rights – 6 mins

Systemic Election Fraud Graham has the receipts – 2 mins

Closing speech re Election Petition appeal challenge from Returning – 10 mins

More Legal / Lawful details. Halsbury Laws are a set of books which Lawyers use as a ‘bible’ of laws etc, they have been published since 1900′ currently in the 5th Edition. The publishing is now in the names of Lexis Nexis – who are Thomson Reuters, (oh how funny).

When you compare early edition to current, the language change is interesting (political propaganda), but it does not change the Law.

England is a country, Scotland is a Country.

Great Britain is NOT a country. why because the English Law is Different to Scottish Law. (Scottish Law being Roman Based (Administrative) and NOT Common Law)

In order to be a country you must all have the same laws (Judicial System) Common Law V Roman Law.

I will not explain UK or British Isles as they are another layer and that would take too long.

What i am about to detail further relates to you also as Americans of 1776.

When English People go to court (they do not know this) for a speeding ticket (as an example) you are going against Great Britain.

Great Britain is a set of Rules (hence why you hear the Term Rules Base Oder, in the world political sphere)

Great Britain at Law is Foreign Law v Common Law.

In 1776 you as Colonist wanted Independence (Common Law) and still are Common Law, but you were arguing with Great Britain (Rules / Administrative Law) it was Common Law Administrative Law, and there are still issues over the Land Patents / Claims. – Why?

In 1706 England was a Country and Scotland was a Country (but both had the same king – Union of the Crowns 1606), And here we go again the East India Company, Scotland tried to set up their own trading company in the Panama region and were going bust (leaving Scotland heading for financial ruin, bit more to the story than). So England and Scotland Politically Merged In 1707 we got the Acts of Union. Now we have the British East India Company.

For the Acts of Union to happen English Laws needed to changed relating to the English Bill of Right, (which is what your Bill of Rights is based off) the last Act of the English parliament was to basically say the Acts of Union will take precedence over all previous Laws.

The English Constitution is a simple yet complex thing, but what they did with the Acts of Union was Unlawful and the centuries rolled on they kept chopping at the Bill of Right, Hence what that YT video goes on about Democracy and Constitution. Lawyers of the recent and Modern day do not know or are taught Constitution Law…. it is catching up with them now.

This also relates back to 1776, because Part 3 of the Bill of Rights 1688 is all about Charters and Grants… which is what the Americas was founded under back in the 1500’s. So when they Un-constitutionally passed the acts of Union in 1707 they messed with those grants.

This is just a highlights overview, the devil is in the detail.

Mike

FullMetalTruth wrote:

The video we asked British cats to dissect:

King Charles STUNS Starmer LIVE — UK Government COLLAPSES as Britain Demands